Preview

Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice

Advanced search

The choice of antibiotic for community-acquired pneumonia – the results of a survey of doctors and an analysis of real outpatient practice

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains an urgent problem in the structure of infectious diseases worldwide including the Russian Federation. According to medical statistics the incidence rate of CAP increased by 19.1 % by December 2018 as compared to year 2017. The authors addressed the problem of rational choice of antimicrobial agents (AMAs) for outpatient treatment of this disease. The aim was to assess structure and rationality of choice of AMAs for outpatient treatment of CAP by primary care physicians in municipal outpatient clinics in Moscow. A two-stage single-center pharmacoepidemic study was conducted. The survey involved 45 primary care physicians with average age 48.5 ± 13.2 years and medical experience 22.7 ± 13.6 years. Relevant information was also copied out from 650 ambulatory records of patients receiving AMs for CAP. According to the results of our survey the leaders of the respondents’ preferences are beta-lactam antibiotics — amoxicillin/clavulanate (49.0 %) followed by amoxicillin (25.5 %) and cephalosporins (15.7 %). Analysis of real clinical practice brings different picture: cephalosporins become comparable to amoxicillin/clavulanate in terms of frequency of administration, The latter significantly loses popularity, as does amoxicillin as monotherapy These data match with similar survey of 233 Moscow primary care physicians conducted earlier in 2013-2014 by one of the authors where amoxicillin/clavulanate accounted for 43.6 % of total AMAs recommendations. Thus, the initial choice of AMAs for outpatient treatment of CAP in most cases does not comply with current clinical guidelines. Physicians tend to start initial outpatient management of CAP with second-line AMAs (amoxicillin/clavulanate, cephalosporins, less commonly fluoroquinolones), underestimating macrolides and almost neglecting doxycycline. These circumstances result in unwarranted increase in drug load on the patient, decrease in safety of treatment and ineffectiveness of antimicrobial therapy in case if CAP is caused by atypical pathogens.

About the Authors

V. G. Deriushkin
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Deriushkin Vladimir - MPA, lecturer Department of Public Health and Health. SPIN code: 8227-1396

Moscow



A. P. Ternavskii
GBUZ «GBUZ GP No. 175 DZM»
Russian Federation

Ternavskii Aleksei – Head doctor

Moscow



E. A. Ulyanova
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Ulianova Elena - MD, Candidate of Medical Sciences assistant professor Department of Therapy No. 1. SPIN code: 8760-2508

Moscow



S. V. Gatsura
A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Gatsura Sergey - MD, DrSci, Professor Department of Therapy No. 1. SPIN code: 5022-0035

Moscow



References

1. Rachina S.A., Sinopalnikov A.I. Clinical Guidelines for Community-acquired Pneumonia in Adults: Version 2019. Prakticheshaia pulmonologia. 2018;(3):8-12. (In Russ).

2. Mandell LA. Community-acquired pneumonia: an overview. Postgraduate Medicine 2015 Aug; 127(6):607-15.

3. Chuchalin A.G. Pneumonia as an actual medical problem of the 21th century. Russian Pulmonology. 2015;25(2):133-142. (In Russ). DOI: 10.18093/0869-01892015-25-2-133-142

4. Infektsionnaia zabolevaemosti v Rossiiskoi Federatii za ianvari-dekabri 2018 god. (In Russ). Электронный ресурс: https://rospotrebnadzor.ru/activities/statistical-materials/statictic_details.php?ELEMENT_ID=11277, дата доступа 15.02.2020 г.

5. Sinopalnikov A.I. Antibiotics and community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. To whom? Which one? Clinical microbiology and antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2019:21(1):27-38. (In Russ). DOI: 10.36488/cmac.2019.1.27-38

6. Dvoretskii L.I. Oshibki vedeniya bolynyh vnebolynichnoy pnevmoniey. Moghno li ih izbeghaty? RMJ. 2009;(23):15331538. (In Russ). Электронный ресурс: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/pulmonologiya/Oshibki_vedeniya_bolynyh_vnebolynichnoy_pnevmoniey__Moghno_li_ih_izbeghaty/, дата доступа 22.02.2020 г.

7. Gatsura S.V., Gatsura O.A., Golosova A.N., Maichuk E.Yu. Choice of drugs by a graduator of a medical university in individual standard situations of outpatient practice. Medicinskij sovet. 2017;(20):206-209. (In Russ). DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2017-20-206-209

8. Vnebolnichnaia pnevmonia. Algoritmy vedenija pacientov. Departament zdravoohranenija g. Moskvy. Moskva. 2018;58-63. (In Russ).

9. Gatsura O.A., Gatsura S.V. New as well-forgotten old: how easy is it to return to the traditions? (for the anniversary of order №1175n MoH RF). Remedium. 2014;(10):33-35. (In Russ).

10. Aleksandrov M.V., Ushakova S.E., Budnikova N.V., et al. Pharmacoeconomic Aspects of the Treatment of Community-acquired Pneumonia in Outpatients. Lechebnoe delo. 2016;(3):29-36. (In Russ).


Review

For citations:


Deriushkin V.G., Ternavskii A.P., Ulyanova E.A., Gatsura S.V. The choice of antibiotic for community-acquired pneumonia – the results of a survey of doctors and an analysis of real outpatient practice. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2019;(4):50-54. (In Russ.)

Views: 1046


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2588-0519 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8473 (Online)