Regional experience in drug provision for patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective analysis of government procurement in Moscow region
https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2025-3-17-34
EDN: SZQCMU
Abstract
Objective. To conduct a pharmacoepidemiologic and pharmacoeconomic analysis of government procurement of drugs for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM) in Moscow region during 2020–2022, assessing the compliance of real clinical practice with current recommendations and identifying opportunities to optimize drug provision for patients.
Materials and methods. A retrospective pharmacoepidemiologic analysis of data on government procurement of key drugs used in the treatment of metastatic MM for the period 2020–2022 in Moscow region was performed, followed by a cost analysis. The analysis included 17 INNs: vemurafenib, vinblastine, dabrafenib, dacarbazine, imatinib, interferon alfa-2b, ipilimumab, carboplatin, cobimetinib, lomustine, nivolumab, paclitaxel, pembrolizumab, prolgolimab, temozolomide, trametinib, and cisplatin. The number of customers, trade names, dosage forms and packaging, number of packages purchased, cost per package, and total costs were analyzed. The average cost per 1 mg of active substance was separately evaluated over time. The results were processed using MS Excel 2019 and presented as absolute values and percentages.
Results. Data from the procurement information system (https://zakupki.gov.ru) for 2020–2022 were analyzed, covering 1,831 government procurements of 17 INNs used for MM treatment in Moscow region healthcare facilities (622 in 2020, 686 in 2021, 523 in 2022). Total expenditure for the 17 INNs amounted to 4.8 billion rubles for the entire 2020–2022 period (1.3 billion in 2020, 1.8 billion in 2021, 1.7 billion rubles in 2022), with an increase in expenditure of more than 30 %. The cost structure was dominated by 3 INNs throughout the analyzed period — dabrafenib, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, accounting for an average of 76.5 % of all expenses. During 2020–2022, pembrolizumab was the absolute leader (accounting for 39.2 % of purchases in 2020, 33.3 % in 2021, and 35.2 % in 2022), with cost growth of 1.2 times. Regarding the average cost per 1 mg of active substance, the most expensive MM treatments were: ipilimumab, trametinib, pembrolizumab, prolgolimab, and nivolumab. Over the 3-year period, among these INNs, only ipilimumab showed an increase in the average cost per 1 mg (+18.6 %), while prolgolimab showed a significant decrease (–17.2 %). When comparing different healthcare settings, there is a clear trend toward decreasing numbers of patients receiving oral targeted therapies in inpatient settings, while in outpatient settings the number of patients significantly increases, especially evident for the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib.
Conclusions. Our study is the first example of a comprehensive pharmacoepidemiologic and pharmacoeconomic analysis covering various aspects of drug provision for patients with metastatic MM — government procurement, provision within preferential drug supply programs, and specialized medical care in hospital settings. The research results create an information base for making clinically and economically sound healthcare decisions, which can be used in developing regional oncology service programs, planning drug procurement, and improving the drug supply system for patients with metastatic MM.
Keywords
УДК: 615.036.2:616-006.81.04
About the Authors
K. A. KokushkinRussian Federation
Konstantin A. Kokushkin — Research supervisor
Krasnogorsk
V. S. Krysanova
Russian Federation
Vera S. Krysanova — Lecturer at the Department of Therapy with a course in Pharmacology and Pharmacy in Medical Institute of Continuing Education in BIOTECH University
Moscow
E. V. Makarova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina V. Makarova — Cand. Sci. (Med.), Research Fellow at the Research Laboratory of Pharmacy, Pharmacology, Pharmacognosy, Pharmaceutical Technology, and Chemistry of the ROSUNIMED
Moscow
I. S. Krysanov
Russian Federation
Ivan S. Krysanov — Cand. Sci. (Pharm.), Assistant professor, Head of the of the Pharmacy course in BIOTECH University; Head of the Clinical and Economic Analysis Department; Head of the Laboratory for Assessment of Healthcare Technologies and Clinical and Economic Expertise of the ROSUNIMED
Moscow; Mytishchi
M. V. Zhuravleva
Russian Federation
Marina V. Zhuravleva — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases; Deputy Director of the Center for Clinical Pharmacology
Moscow
A. V. Snegovoy
Russian Federation
Anton V. Snegovoy — Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Department
Moscow
References
1. Zhukovets A. Modern principles and prospects of skin melanoma treatment. Oncological journal. 2015;4(9):69–76. (In Russ.)
2. Clinical and technological algorithm for drug therapy of skin melanoma: ICD-10 code − C43 / K. A. Kokushkin, A. A. Kostin, M. V. Davydovskaya, N. V. Kobzeva, T. N. Ermolaeva, [et al.], Reviewers: Byakhov M. Yu., Shikina V. E. − ed., Krasnogorsk: Pero Publishing House, Moscow, 2021. 130 p.
3. Arnold M, Singh D, Laversanne M, et al. Global Burden of Cutaneous Melanoma in 2020 and Projections to 2040. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 May 1;158(5):495-503. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0160.
4. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
5. Kaprin A. D., Starinsky V. V., Shakhzadova A. O. The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2023 / A. D. Kaprin, V. V. Starinsky, A. O. Shakhzadova, ill. − ed., Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute − branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “NMITs Radiology” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2024. 262 p.
6. Edited by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2024. − M.: P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute − branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2025. − ill. − 275 p.
7. Poliakova КI, Holownia-Voloskova ME, Byakhov MYu, et al. comparative analysis of cost of drug therapy of the most high-cost oncological diseases in Moscow. Malignant tumours. 2018;8(2):12-20. (In Russ.)
8. Krysanova V, Poliakova K, Ermolaeva T, et al. Health and economic burden in direct costs of melanoma in Moscow for 2016-2017. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019. Т. 75. Suppl 1. S 19-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-019-02685-2
9. Sharov SV, Leonov MG. Prospects for Melanoma of the Skin Drug Treatment. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya. 2018;25:50-53. (In Russ.)
10. Clinical guidelines. Melanoma of the skin and mucous membranes / Association of specialists in melanoma problems, Association of oncologists of Russia, Russian Society of Clinical Oncology, Russian Society of Pediatric Oncologists and Hematologists. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2025.
11. Amaral T, Ottaviano M, Arance A, et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2025 Jan;36(1):10-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.11.006.
12. Garbe C, Amaral T, Peris K, et al; European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment − Update 2022. Eur J Cancer. 2022 Jul;170:256-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.018.
13. Swetter SM, Johnson D, Albertini MR, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2024. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Jul;22(5):290-298. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.0036.
14. Kokushkin KA, Krysanova VS, Makarova EV, Krysanov IS, Zhuravleva MV, Snegovoy AV. Analysis of drug therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma of the skin using the example of the Moscow region. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2025;3:4-16. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kokushkin K.A., Krysanova V.S., Makarova E.V., Krysanov I.S., Zhuravleva M.V., Snegovoy A.V. Regional experience in drug provision for patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective analysis of government procurement in Moscow region. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. :17-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2025-3-17-34. EDN: SZQCMU