Preview

Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice

Advanced search

Clinical-economic analysis of the target therapy in severe atopic dermatitidis in adults

https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2022-1-17-29

Abstract

Target therapy of severe atopic dermatitidis (AD) is actual because AD has a high prevalence and social-economic burden. Target therapy consists of monoclonal antibodies (dupilumab) as well as janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib and baricitinib). Aim. Health technology assessment of the severe AD target therapy in adults. Мaterials and methods. EASI-75 has been chosen as efficacy criterion in the clinical trial of dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks and upadacitinib 30 mg od during 24 weeks, indirect treatment comparison for dupilumab and baricitinib 4 mg od with odds ratio (OR) during 16 weeks has been performed. Modelling with “Tree of decision” method was made for comparable efficacy evaluation on 52-d week of the treatment. Direct medical cost has been calculated for: target and topic therapy, complications, prophylaxis of janus kinase inhibitors side effects. Budget impact analysis for janus kinase inhibitors substitution with dupilumab during 3-years horizon on 100 pts was performed. Multilateral sensitivity analyses were made for results validation. Results. Efficacy of dupilumab and upadacitinib on point 24 w were equal (EASI-75 59,5 % [95 % CI: 54,4; 64,7] and 64,2 % [95 % CI: 59,1; 69,2] accordingly) and on 52 w (65,0 % and 69,0 %, OR vs dupilumab 1,1 [95 % CI: 0,68; 2,1]). Dupilumab has more efficacy than baricitinib on 16 w of therapy (EASI75 65,7 % and 48,0 % accordingly, OR 2,09 [95 % CI: 1,31; 3,35]) and on 52 w (65,0 % and 55,7%, OR vs dupilumab 0,75 [95% CI: 0,47; 0,96]). Dupilumab had economic advantages on 21 % vs upadacitinib during year (993 495 Rub. and 1 253 164 Rub. per patient accordingly based on cost-minimization analysis). Dupilumab was on 11,8 % more economic vs baricitinib based on cost-effective analysis during one year of therapy also. Substitution of janus kinase inhibitors on dupilumab can lead to budget saving on 18,1–44,9 % during 3 years. Results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses. Conclusion. Health Technology of the severe AD treatment in adults with dupilumab is an economic proved.

About the Authors

A. S. Kolbin
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Academician I. P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation; Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saint-Petersburg State University”
Russian Federation

Kolbin Alexey S. - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine, FSBEI HE I. P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia; Professor of the Department of Pharmacology of the Faculty of Medicine, Saint-Petersburg University
SPIN code: 7966-0845

Saint-Petersburg



Y. M. Gomon
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Academician I. P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Gomon Yulia M. - Dr. Sci. (Med.), assistant of professor of the Department of Clinical pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine

Saint-Petersburg



M. A. Proskurin
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saint-Petersburg State University”
Russian Federation

Proskurin Maksim A. - assistant of the Department of mathematical modeling of energy systems, faculty of applied mathematics and control processes
SPIN code: 7406-2352

Saint-Petersburg



Y. E. Balikina
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saint-Petersburg State University”
Russian Federation

Balykina Julia E. - PhD in Physico-Mathematical Sciences, Department of control processes, faculty of applied mathematics

Saint-Petersburg



References

1. Ständer S. Atopic Dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(12):1136–43. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2023911

2. Nakahara T, Kido-Nakahara M, Tsuji G, Furue M. Basics and recent advances in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol. 2021;48(2):130–9. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.15664

3. Price KN, Krase JM, Loh TY et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in global Atopic Dermatitis clinical trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):378–80. doi:10.1111/bjd.18938

4. Megna M, Patruno C, Balato A et al. An Italian multicenter study on adult atopic dermatitis: persistent versus adult-onset disease. Arch Dermatol Res. 2017;309(6):443–52. doi:10.1007/s00403-017-1739-y

5. Wang V, Boguniewicz J, Boguniewicz M, Ong PY. The infectious complications of atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;126(1):3–12. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2020.08.002

6. Carrascosa JM, Morillas-Lahuerta V. Comorbidities in Atopic Dermatitis: An Update and Review of Controversies. Actas Dermosifi liogr (Engl Ed). 2020;111(6):481–6. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2020.04.009

7. Krysanov IS, Krysanova VS, Karpov OI, Ermakova VYu. Social-economic burden of severe atopic dermatitis in the Russian Federation. Kachestvennaya klinicheskaya praktika. 2019;(4):4–14. (In Russ). doi:10.1016/2588-0519-2019-4-14

8. Atopic Dermatitis. Clinical Guidelines 2021 (In Russ), accessed January 13, 2022. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/265_2.

9. Agache I, Song Y, Posso M et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review for the EAACI Biologicals Guidelines. Allergy. 2021;76(1):45–58. doi:10.1111/all.14510

10. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis: an expanding therapeutic pipeline for a complex disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(1):21–40. doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00266-6

11. Govt Order #2406-r from October 12, 2019 (In Russ), accessed January 13, 2022. http://base.garant.ru/72861778/.

12. Cartron AM, Nguyen TH, Roh YS et al. Janus kinase inhibitors for atopic dermatitis: a promising treatment modality. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021;46(5):820–4. doi:10.1111/ced.14567

13. Novikov P, Shevtsova T, Shchegoleva E, Moiseev S. JAK-inhibitors: pharmacological properties and comparative clinical efficacy and safety. Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya = Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;30(1):51–60 (In Russ). doi:10.32756/0869-5490-2021-1-51-60

14. Chang PH, Huang SF, Chang PS, Yu Y. Safety considerations of systemic Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis applications. J Dermatol. 2021;48(11):1631–9. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.16116

15. Инструкция по медицинскому применению ЛС «Олумиант». Государственный реестр лекарственных средств. [Olumiant SMPC. Govt Register of Drugs (In Russ), accessed January 13, 2022]. Доступно по: https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=aeba7a96-640f-4474-8a57-e343a7d864d3&t=. Обращение к ресурсу 13.01.2022.

16. Rinvoq SMPC. Govt Register of Drugs (In Russ), accessed January 13, 2022]. https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=1db2dbf3-e296-4fd2-883a28b5c175b229&t=.

17. Govt Order #3073-r from November 23, 2020 (In Russ), accessed January 13, 2022]. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202011250016.

18. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Chamlin SL et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(2):338–51. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.010

19. Blauvelt A, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(9):1047–55. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3023

20. Silverberg JI, de Bruin-Weller M., Bieber T, et al. Upadacitinib plus topical corticosteroids in atopic dermatitis: Week 52 AD Up study results. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;S0091-6749(21):01212–4. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.036

21. Reich K, Teixeira HD, de Bruin-Weller M et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2169–81. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00589-4

22. Mohamed MEF, Klunder B, Othman AA. Clinical pharmacokinetics of Upadacitinib: review of data relevant to the Rheumatoid Arthritis indication. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59(5):531–44. doi:10.1007/s40262-019-00855-0

23. Katzung B. Basic and clinical Pharmacology / Translated from English by Zvartau E. 2-d Ed. StPetersburg: Binom, 2008. (In Russ).

24. Blauvelt A, de Bruin-Weller M, Gooderham M et al. Long-term management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab and concomitant topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS): a 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017;389(10086):2287–303. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31191-1

25. Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Wollenberg A, et al. Long-term efficacy of baricitinib in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who were treatment responders or partial responders: an extension study of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(6):691–9. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1273

26. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Indirect treatment comparison (ITC). Available at: https://www.cadth.ca/. Accessed January 09, 2022.

27. Pharmacoeconomics and pharmacoepidemiology — practice of the right decisions / Ed. VB Gerasimov, AL Khokhlov, OI Karpov. Moscow, 2005. (In Russ).

28. de Bruin-Weller M, Th açi D, Smith CH et al. Dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroid treatment in adults with atopic dermatitis with an inadequate response or intolerance to ciclosporin A or when this treatment is medically inadvisable: a placebo-controlled, randomized phase III clinical trial (LIBERTY AD CAFE). Br J Dermatol 2018;178(5):1083–101. doi:10.1111/bjd.16156

29. Reich K, Kabashima K, Peris K, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib Combined With Topical Corticosteroids for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(12):1333–43. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.32608

30. Wollenberg A, Nakahara T, Maari C, et al. Impact of baricitinib in combination with topical steroids on atopic dermatitis symptoms, quality of life and functioning in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from the BREEZE-AD7 Phase 3 randomized trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(7):1543–52. doi:10.1111/jdv.17278

31. Reich K, Teixeira HD, de Bruin-Weller M, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10290):2169–81. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00589-40

32. Simpson EL, Lacour JP, Spelman L, et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomized monotherapy phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):242–55. doi:10.1111/bjd.18898

33. Ariëns LFM, Gadkari A, van Os-Medendorp H, et al. Dupilumab versus cyclosporine for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults: indirect comparison using the eczema area and severity index. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(10):851–7. doi:10.2340/00015555-3219

34. Govt Register of Drugs. (In Russ), accessed January 10, 2022. https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Default.aspx.

35. Pharmaceutical portal PHARMINDEX.RF (In Russ), accessed January 10, 2022. https://www.pharmindex.ru/.

36. Govt Order #2505 from Dec 28, 2021 “O Programme gosudarstvennyh garantij besplatnogo okazaniya grazhdanam medicinskoj pomoshchi na 2022 god i na planovyj period 2023 i 2024 godov”. (In Russ), accessed January 09, 2022. http://static.government.ru/media/files/de3NXxmFdnBk5LLok0KHjVaKd7aw67Ul.pdf.

37. FOMS Guidelines about payment for medical aid in frames of obligatory medical insurance fund (In Russ), accessed January 09, 2022. https://rosmedex.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/metodicheskierekomendaczii.pdf.

38. Order of Minzdrav Russia #199 from April 5, 2019 “Preduprezhdenie i bor’ba s social’no znachimymi infekcionnymi zabolevaniyami”. (In Russ), accessed January 13, 2022. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/554140339.


Review

For citations:


Kolbin A.S., Gomon Y.M., Proskurin M.A., Balikina Y.E. Clinical-economic analysis of the target therapy in severe atopic dermatitidis in adults. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2022;(1):17-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2022-1-17-29

Views: 955


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2588-0519 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8473 (Online)