Preview

Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice

Advanced search

Comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis and qualitative evaluation methods of antibiotic prophylaxis during cataract surgery

Abstract

Purpose. Comparative evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis systemic fluoroquinolones cataract. Methods. A retrospective randomized trial of postoperative infectious complications after 9 314 cataract surgery performed by «small sections» technology from 2012 to 2014. Group 1 patients received 0,5% levofloxacin instillation (4 times a day for three days before surgery), 2nd group patients received additional systemic levofloxacin (oral, 500 mg / day). Relative risk (RR), relative risk reduction (RRR) and absolute risk reduction (ATS) complications, the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) were сalculated. Results. In group of patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis just as instillation fluoroquinolones, infection rates were 0,25%, while in the group where the patients received an additional fluoroquinolone systems but - 0,02%. RR 0,08, COP - 0,92 CAP - 0,23%, NNT - amounted to 423. The costs of systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis exceeded the cost of a local antibiotic prophylaxis 1,8 times. At the same time the costs of treatment which developed endophthalmitis in 12 group 1 exceeded the value of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment of endophthalmitis after systemic use of levofloxacin. Conclusions. System use of fluoroquinolones in the perioperative period of cataract surgery is an effective method of preventing infectious tion of postoperative complications as clinical as the economic aspects.

About the Authors

E. V. Eliseeva
Pacific State Medical University
Russian Federation


G. A. Fedyashev
Pacific State Medical university; Primorsky center of eye microsurgery
Russian Federation


P. V. Shellenberg
Pacific State Medical university
Russian Federation


References

1. Бандурова Е.А., Шуматов В.Б., Елисеева Е.В. Локальный микробиологический мониторинг и антибиотикорезистентность основных патогенов у пациентов с хирургической патологией в отделении интенсивной терапии // Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал. 2012; 3: 25-29.

2. ESCRS Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Endophthalmitis Following Cataract Surgery: Data, Dilemmas and Conclusions 2013/ Editors: Barry P., Cordovés L., Gardner S. ESCRS. 2013. 45.

3. George J.M., Fiscella R., Blair M., Rodvold K., Ulanski L., Stokes J. et al. Aqueous and vitreous penetration of linezolid and levofloxacin after oral administration // J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010; 26: 6: 579-586.

4. Sharifi E., Porco T.C., Naseri A. Cost-effectiveness analysis of intracameral cefuroxime use for prophylaxis of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery // Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 10: 1887-1896.

5. Власов В.В. Эпидемиология: Учеб. пособие для вузов. М.: ГЭОТАР-Мед, 2004; 464.

6. Braga-Mele R., Chang D.F., Henderson B.A., Mamalis N., Talley-Rostov A., Vasavada A. Intracameral antibiotics: Safety, efficacy, and preparation // J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40: 12: 2134-2142.

7. Vaziri K., Schwartz S.G., Kishor K., Flynn H. W. Endophthalmitis: state of the art // Clin. Ophthalmol. 2015; 9: 95-108.

8. Barry P. Adoption of intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis of endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: update on the ESCRS endophthalmitis Study // J. Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40: 1: 138-142.

9. Gower E.W., Keay L.J., Stare D.E., Arora P., Cassard S.D., Behrens A. et al. Characteristics of Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery in the United States Medicare Population // Ophthalmology. 2015; 122: 8: 1625-1632.

10. Ishida M., Kataoka T., Niwa K., Iwaki M., Zako M. J. Efficient penetration into aqueous humor by administration of oral and topical levofloxacin // Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011; 27: 3: 247-250.

11. Kessel L., Flesner P., Andresen J., Erngaard D., Tendal B., Hjortdal J. Antibiotic prevention of postcataract endophthalmitis: a systematic review and metaanalysis // Acta Ophthalmol. 2015; 93: 4: 303-317.

12. Matsuura K., Mori T., Miyamoto T., Suto C., Saeki Y., Tanaka S. et al. Survey of Japanese ophthalmic surgeons regarding perioperative disinfection and antibiotic prophylaxis in cataract surgery // Clin. Ophthalmol. 2014; 29: 8: 2013-2018.

13. Sakamoto H., Sakamoto M., Hata Y., Kubota T., Ishibashi T. Aqueous and vitreous penetration of levofloxacin after topical and/or oral administration // Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2007; 17: 3: 372-376.

14. Rudnisky C.J., Wan D., Weis E. Antibiotic choice for the prophylaxis of post-cataract extraction endophthalmitis // Ophthalmology. 2014; 121: 4: 835-841.


Review

For citations:


Eliseeva E.V., Fedyashev G.A., Shellenberg P.V. Comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis and qualitative evaluation methods of antibiotic prophylaxis during cataract surgery. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2016;(2):24-28. (In Russ.)

Views: 749


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2588-0519 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8473 (Online)