Preview

Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice

Advanced search

The problem of over-volunteering in early phase clinical trials

https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0519-2018-10045

Abstract

This article discusses important problem of early phase clinical trials – over-volunteering. The overlapping or dual enrollment of healthy volunteers is a potential high risk not only to study subjects, but also to commercial sponsors because it could cause the delay in advancement of promising drug candidates. The problem of over-volunteering is payed special attention by clinical research professionals in foreign countries. Guidelines for early phase clinical trials recommend implementation of different control and prevention measures of multiple enrollment. The most effective instrument to prevent over-volunteering is considered to be a central internet-based registry of healthy volunteers. Such registries operate in various countries and differ in structure, scope of information collected, types of funding and management. The general operating principles of such registries are described on the example of TOPS data base. TOPS is а special system to prevent over-volunteering that is used by UK phase 1 units. In conclusion, authors urge regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies to approach this problem closely because over-volunteering is already a burning issue in our country. It is essential to improve relevant regulatory framework and launch central registries of healthy subjects with regard to international experience.

About the Authors

S. B. Fitilev
FGAOU VO «RUDN University», Medical Institute, Russian Federation, Moscow
Russian Federation

D.M., professor, Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology

Scopus Author ID: 6701762621

SPIN-код: 8287-8456



A. V. Vozzhaev
FGAOU VO «RUDN University», Medical Institute, Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Russian Federation, Moscow
Russian Federation

associate professor

Scopus Author ID: 57194398586

SPIN code: 8637-8963



I. I. Shkrebniova
FGAOU VO «RUDN University», Medical Institute, Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Russian Federation, Moscow
Russian Federation

associate professor

Scopus Author ID: 6505823859

SPIN code: 1105-5760



D. A. Kliuev
FGAOU VO «RUDN University», Medical Institute, Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Russian Federation, Moscow
Russian Federation
post-graduate student


References

1. Tishler CL, Bartholomae S. The recruitment of normal healthy volunteers: a review of the literature on the use of financial incentives. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2002;42:365-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00912700222011409.

2. Royal College of Physicians (1986) Research on healthy volunteers. A report of the Royal College of Physicians. J R Coll Physicians 20:3–17.

3. Resnik DB, Koski G. A National Registry for Healthy Volunteers in Phase 1 Clinical Trials. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2011;305(12):1236-1237. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.354.

4. Tishler CL, Bartholomae S. Repeat participation among normal healthy research volunteers: professional guinea pigs in clinical trials? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 2003;46(4):508-520. doi:10.1353/pbm.2003.0094.

5. Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2).

6. Kupetsky-Rincon E, Kraft W. Healthy Volunteer Registries and Ethical Research Principles. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2012;91(6):965-968. doi:10.1038/clpt.2012.32.

7. Оценка биоэквивалентности лекарственных средств. Методические указания МЗСР РФ. – М., 2008. [Otsenka bioekvivalentnosti lekarstvennykh sredstv. Metodicheskie ukazaniya MZSR RF. – M., 2008. (In Russ.)]

8. Приказ Минздрава РСФСР от 25.08.1992 №235 «Об организации отделений клинических испытаний лекарственных препаратов на здоровых добровольцах». [Prikaz Minzdrava RSFSR ot 25.08.1992 №235 «Ob organizatsii otdelenii klinicheskikh ispytanii lekarstvennykh preparatov na zdorovykh dobrovol'tsakh». (In Russ.)]

9. Guidelines for phase 1 clinical trials, 2012 edition, ABPI.

10. Guidance for organizations performing in vivo bioequivalence studies (Annex 9), WHO Technical Report Series No.996, 2016.

11. Zanini GM, Marone C. A new job: research volunteer? Swiss medical weekly. 2005;135(21-22):315-317. doi:2005/21/smw-10956.

12. Boyce M, Walther M, Nentwich H, Kirk J, Smith S, Warrington S. TOPS: an internet-based system to prevent healthy subjects from over-volunteering for clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2012;68(7):1019-1024. doi:10.1007/s00228-012-1231-8.

13. Boyce M, Walther M, Kirk J, Smith S, Warrington S. Survey of users of TOPS, an internet-based system to pre-vent healthy subjects from over-volunteering for clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2013;69:1757. doi:10.1007/s00228-013-1534-4.

14. Allen C, Francis G, Martin J, Boyce M. Regulatory experience of TOPS: an internet-based system to prevent healthy subjects from over-volunteering for UK clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2017;73:1551-1555. doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2329-9.

15. The Over-Volunteering Prevention System. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/committees-and-services/the-over-volunteering-prevention-system/


Review

For citations:


Fitilev S.B., Vozzhaev A.V., Shkrebniova I.I., Kliuev D.A. The problem of over-volunteering in early phase clinical trials. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2018;(2):58-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0519-2018-10045

Views: 811


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2588-0519 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8473 (Online)