Economic evaluation of insulin therapy intensification for effective and safe control of diabetes mellitus type 2
https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0519-2019-10070
Abstract
Insulin therapy is one of the effective methods of effective control of diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) which can manage resistance to insulin. Insulin’s analogs have advantages in compare with human insulins in frames of safety (less amount of hypoglycemia, including severe). Safety profile can be improved with combination of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide receptor-1 agonist (aGLP-1). Economic aspects of such kind treatment in compare with standard regimen of basal-bolus and basal plus for local conditions are not known yet.
Materials and methods. Economic parameters of the fixed combination of insulin glargine 100 Ul/ml plus lixisenatide (Soliqua SoloStar®) [Regimen 1] were calculated based on prognostic model of risk of T2DM complications, efficacy and safety. Comparison has been made with insulin glargine 100 Ul/ml + insulin glulisine [Regimen 2], insulin glargine 100 Ul/ml + insulin aspart [Regimen 3], insulin detemir + insulin aspart [regimen 4], insulin degludec + insulin aspart [Regimen 5]. Efficacy and safety has been prognosed in different time of model (1-5 years). Direct costs of out-patient treatment, hospitalization cost (complications of T2DM) as well as expenditures on severe hypoglycemia episodes and insulins in DDD were calculated. Published data of clinical trials and real world evidences were used.
Results. Results of T2DM control and prognosis of complications were practically similar in all regimens of therapy. The different rates of hypoglycemia including severe were found for regimens: Regimen 1 — 3,03 и 0,02 events/patient-year; Regimen 2 — 4,1 и 2,3; Regimen 3 — 16,4 и 2,3; Regimen 4 — 9,5 и 2,3 %; Regimen 5 — 11,6 — 0,47 accordingly. Regimen 5 had a highest utilitarian cost based on DDD. Total direct costs, including all expenditures was less in Regimen 1 — 73 956 RUR/patient/year. In the same time expenditures for Regimen 2 were 93 258 RUR, for 3 — 92 289 RUR, for 4 — 87 598 RUR, for 5 — 79 396 RUR.
Conclusion. Fixed dose combination Soliqua SoloStar® is an economic proven strategy for effective control of T2DM in compare with basal-bolus and basal plus regimens of insulin therapy.
About the Authors
A. S. KolbinRussian Federation
Kolbin Alexey - MD, DrSci, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine, FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia; professor of the Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, St. Petersburg SU
SPIN-code: 7966-0845
A. A. Kurilev
Russian Federation
Kurilev Aleksey - Assistant of professor Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine
SPIN-code: 4470-7845
Yu. E. Balikina
Russian Federation
Balykina Julia - PhD in Physico-mathematical sciences, Department of control processes, faculty of applied mathematics
M. A. Proskurin
Russian Federation
Proskurin Maksim - assistant of the Department of mathematical modeling of energy systems, faculty of applied mathematics and control processes
SPIN-code: 7406-2352
O. I. Karpov
Russian Federation
Karpov Oleg - MD, DrSci, Professor, Head of Eurasia HEOR.
Moscow
References
1. Dedov II, Kontsevaya AV, Shestakova MV, et al. Economic evaluation of type 2 diabetes mellitus burden and its main cardiovascular complications in the Russian Federation. Diabetes Mellitus. 2016;19(6):518-527 (In Russ). DOI: 10.14341/DM8153
2. Dedov II, Kalashnikova MF, Belousov DYu, et al. Cost-of-illness analysis of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the russian federation: results from Russian multicenter observational pharmacoepidemiologic study of diabetes care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (FORSIGHT-T2DM). Diabetes Mellitus. 2017;20(6):403-419 (In Russ). DOI: 10.14341/DM9278
3. Balanova YA, Kontsevaya AV, Imaeva AE, et al. Economic losses due to low coverage of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with cardiovascular diseases in the Russian Federation. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2018;14(5):716-724. (In Russ). DOI 10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-5-716-724
4. Popovich LD, Potapchik EG, Svetlichnaya SV. Economic benefits evaluation due to effective programs of Diabetes Mellitus type 2 treatment realization. Moscow: High Economics School, 2018. (In Russ).
5. Belousov DYu, Karpov OI. Economic aspects of the second generation insulin analogs in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2. Kachestvennaya klinicheskaya practica. 2019;1:4-11 (In Russ). DOI: 10.24411/2588-0519-2019-10053
6. Jin SM, Kim JH, Min KW, et al. Basal-prandial versus premixed insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin intensification after basal insulin optimization: A 24-week randomized non-inferiority trial. J Diabetes. 2016;8(3):405-413. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.12312
7. Eng C, Krammer CK, Zinman B, et al. Glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonist and basal insulin combination treatment for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:2228-2234. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61335-0
8. Ahren B, Gautier JF, Berria R, et al. Pronounced reduction of postprandial glucagon by lixisenatide: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2014;16:861-868. DOI: 10.1111/dom.12290
9. Zyryanov SK, Dyakov IN. Health technology assessement of the fixed combination of insulin glargine 100 Ul/ml and lixisenatide in the treatment intensifi cation of diabetes mellitus type 2. Kachestvennaya klinicheskayapraktika. 2018;3:4-13. (In Russ). DOI:10.24411/2588-0519-2018-10047
10. Belousov DYu, Karpov OI. Estimate while transferring patients with Diabetes Mellitus from Insulin Glargine-100 to Insulin Glargine-300 in Real-Life Practice. Kachestvennaya kilnicheskaya praktika. 2017;3:4-15. (In Russ).
11. Kolbin AS, Hmel’nickij OK, Kurylev AA. The first experience of simulation modelling of diabetes mellitus type 2 outcomes prognosis with discrete analysis. Clinical-economic expertise. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;6(2):24-31. (In Russ).
12. Mosikian АА, Galankin TL, Zhao W, Kolbin AS. Decision modelling for the evaluation of diabetes outcomes. PHARMACOECONOMICS. Modern pharmacoeconomics and pharmacoepidemiology. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya. 2017;10(3):47-58. (In Russ). DOI: 10.17749/2070-4909.2017.10.3.047-058
13. Prikaz Minzdrava Rossii №1581-n ot 28.12.2012 «Ob utverzhdenii standarta pervichnoj mediko-sanitarnoj pomoshchi pri insulinnezavisimom diabete». (In Russ).
14. Raskin P, Gylvin T, Weng W, et al. Comparison of insulin detemir and insulin glargine using a basal-bolus regimen in a randomized, controlled clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009;25:542-548. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.989
15. Omelyanovsky VV, Shestakova MV, Avxentyeva MV, Ignatyeva VI. The economic aspects of Diabetes Mellitus in the National practice. Medical technologies. Evolution and Choice. 2015;22(4):43-60. (In Russ).
16. Evans M, McEwan P, Foos V. Insulin degludec early clinical experience: does the promise from the clinical trials translate into clinical practice — a case-based evaluation. J. Med. Econ. 2015;18(2):96-105. DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2014.975234
17. Rodbard HW, Cariou B, Pieber TR, et al. Treatment intensification with an insulin degludec (IDeg)/insulin apart (IAsp) co-formulation twice daily compared with basal IDeg and prandial IAsp in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled phase III trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(3):274-280. DOI: 10.1111/dom.12609
18. National standard of the Russian Federation. GOST R 57525-2017. Clinical and economic research. General requirements. Approved and put into effect by the Federal Agency for technical regulation and Metrology of July 6, 2017 N655-St // [Electronic resource] access Mode: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200146142
19. Оценка медицинских технологий / Ред. Ю.Б. Белоусов. — М.: Издательство ОКИ. 2013. [Health Technology Assessment / Ed. Yu.B. Belousov. Moscow, OKI. 2013. (In Russ).]
20. Pharmacoeconimcs and pharmacoepidemilogy — practice of right decisions / Ed. V.B. Gerasimov, A.L. Khokhlov, O.I. Karpov. — Moscow: Medicina; 2005. (In Russ).
21. http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru, обращение к ресурсу 24.06.2019
22. Aroda VR, Rosenstock J, Wysham C, et al. Efficacy and safety of LixiLan, a titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine plus lixisenatide in Type 2 Diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin and metformin: The LixiLan-L randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1972-1980. DOI: 10.2337/dc16-1495
23. Khunti K, Alsifri S, Aronson R, et al. Impact of hypoglycaemia on patient-reported outcomes from a global, 24-country study of 27,585 people with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;130:121-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.05.004
24. Malek R, Ajilib F, Assaad-Khalilc SH, et al. Similar glucose control with basal—bolus regimen of insulin detemir plus insulin aspart and thrice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a 50-week randomized clinical trial of stepwise insulin intensification. Diabetes&Metabolism. 2015;41:223-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2014.11.002
25. Генеральное тарифное соглашение ОМС, 2019 год [Электронный ресурс]: http://www.spboms.ru The order of the Government of Russia of 10.12.2018 N 1506 «About the Program of the state guarantees of free rendering to citizens of medical care for 2019 and for the planning period 2020 and 2021».
26. ATC/DDD Index 2015. — http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/ (дата обращения: 06.05.2019).
Review
For citations:
Kolbin A.S., Kurilev A.A., Balikina Yu.E., Proskurin M.A., Karpov O.I. Economic evaluation of insulin therapy intensification for effective and safe control of diabetes mellitus type 2. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2019;(2):25-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0519-2019-10070