Hepatotoxicity of new oral anticoagulants: literature review
https://doi.org/10.24411/2588- 0519-2018-10052
Abstract
Tis article presents a literature review of hepatotoxicity of new oral anticoagulants which was obtained by different methods options of pharmacovigilance. Te overview includes 35 information sources 24 articles, 4 methodic or regulatory guidelines, 3 expert group publications, 3 new drug application overviews and 1 source being clinical trial register search results. Upon the results of the literature review, it was concluded that pharmacovigilance methods analyzing data obtained within real world medical practice give more opportunities for safety signal management comparing to those analyzing only data obtained within randomized clinical trials.
About the Authors
N. S. PopovaRussian Federation
Popova Natalya
Saint-Petersburg
SPIN-code: 3592-9814
A. V. Philippova
Russian Federation
Filippova Anastasia, Post-graduate student, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine, First St. Petersburg State Medical University named afer I.P. Pavlova
Saint-Petersburg
SPIN-code: 3989-9803
T. L. Gakankin
Russian Federation
Gakankin Timofey, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the laboratory of pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacokinetics in the First St. Petersburg State Medical University named afer acad. I.P. Pavlov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
SPIN-code: 7808-0586
A. S. Kolbin
Russian Federation
Kolbin Alexey, MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine, FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia; professor of the Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, St. Petersburg State University
Saint-Petersburg
SPIN-code: 7966-0845
A. R. Kasimova
Russian Federation
Kasimova Alina
Saint-Petersburg
SPIN-code: 3131-4385
References
1. Hayashi PH, Fontana RJ. Clinical features, diagnosis, and natural history of drug-induced liver injury. Semin Liver Dis. 2014;34(2):134—44 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24879979 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1375955
2. Lewis JH. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Troughout the Drug Development Life Cycle: Where We Have Been, Where We are Now, and Where We are Headed. Perspectives of a Clinical Hepatologist. Pharm Med. 2013;27:165—191.
3. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fbrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Russ J Cardiol 2017;7(147):7—86 (In Russ). http://dx.doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2017-7-7-86. DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-7-7-86.
4. Caldeira D, Barra M, Santos AT, et al. Risk of drug-induced liver injury with the new oral anticoagulants: systematic review and metaanalysis. Heart. 2014;100(7):550—6 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24476812 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305288
5. Raschi E, Poluzzi E, Koci A, et al. Liver injury with novel oral anticoagulants: assessing post-marketing reports in the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(2):285—93 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25689417 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12611
6. Kullak-Ublick GA, Andrade RJ, Merz M, et al. Drug-induced liver injury: recent advances in diagnosis and risk assessment. Gut. 2017;66(6):1154—1164 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28341748 (data obrashcheniya 07.02.2018). DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313369
7. Aithal GP, Watkins PB, Andrade RJ, et al. Case defnition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury. Clin Pharmacol Ter. 2011;89(6):806—15 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21544079 (data obrashcheniya 07.02.2018). DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2011.58
8. Panchenko EP, Kropacheva ES. Rekomendacii po antitromboticheskoj terapii u bol`ny`x so stabil`ny`mi proyavleniyami aterotromboza. Institut klinicheskoj kardiologii im. A.L. Myasnikova FGU RKNPK Rosmedtexnologij. Moscow: 2009 (In Russ). URL: http://athero.ru/Panchenkoateru.htm (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018).
9. Sychev DA, Antonov IM, Zagrebin SV, Gasanov NA, Kukes VG. Varfarin dose regime approachs based on pharmacogenetics test results: real possibility to optimize the pharmacotherapy. Rational Pharmacother. Card. 2007;2:59—66. (In Russ).
10. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH Pradaxa — EMEA/ H/C/000829 -II/0103 // 2009. URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000829/WC500041059.pdf (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018)
11. Bayer Pharma AG Xarelto — EMEA/H/C/000944 -IB/0056/G // 2008. URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000944/WC500057108.pdf (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018)
12. Bristol-Myers Squibb / Pfzer EEIG Eliquis -EMEA/H/C/002148 -II/0047 // 2011. URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002148/WC500107728.pdf (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2009).
13. Denas G, Gennaro N, Ferroni E, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonists compared to well-managed vitamin K antagonists in na?ve patients with non-valvular atrial fbrillation: Propensity score matched cohort study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;249:198—203 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28935464 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.029
14. Lega J-C, Bertoletti L, Gremillet C, et al. Consistency of Safety and Efcacy of New Oral Anticoagulants across Subgroups of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. PloS ONE. 2014;9(3):e91398 [online]. URL: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0091398 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091398.
15. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP). 2013 [online]. URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientifc_guideline/2013/04/WC500142282.pdf (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018).
16. EU Clinical Trials Register. Xarelto [online]. URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=Xarelto (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018).
17. European Medicines Agency. Press release AstraZeneca withdraws its application for Ximelagatran 36-mg flm-coated tablets. 2006 [online]. URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Press_release/2010/02/WC500074073.pdf (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018).
18. European Medicines Agency. Section 4.8: Undesirable effects SmPC training presentation. 2013 [online]. URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Presentation/2013/01/WC500137021.pdf (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018).
19. Keisu M, Andersson TB. Drug-induced liver injury in humans: the case of ximelagatran. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2010;(196):407—18 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20020269 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00663-0_13
20. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin-K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fbrillation: Executive summary. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(27):2137—2149 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27282612 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw058
21. Voukalis C, Lip GY, Shantsila E. Drug-drug interactions of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12(12):1445—1461[online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=10.1080%2F17425255.2016.1225037 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2016.1225037
22. Raub TJ. P-glycoprotein recognition of substrates and circumvention through rational drug design. Mol Pharm. 2006;3(1):3—25 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16686365 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018).
23. Ehrenforth S, Schenk JF, Scharrer I. Liver damage induced by coumarin anticoagulants. Semin Tromb Hemost. 1999;25(1):79—83 [online]. URL: https://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-2007-996428 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-996428
24. Nordon C, Karcher H, Groenwold RH, et al. Te «EfcacyEffectiveness Gap»: Historical Background and Current Conceptualization. Value Health. 2016;19(1):75—81 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26797239 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2938
25. High Level Pharmaceutical Forum 2005-2008. Final Conclusions and Recommendations of the Pharmaceutical Forum [online]. URL: http://www.bgpharma.bg/bulletin/read/edition/8/fle/fnal_conclusions_en.pdf (Дата обращения 23.09.2017).
26. Coloma PM, Trifr? G, Patadia V. Postmarketing safety surveillance: where does signal detection using electronic healthcare records ft into the big picture? Drug Saf. 2013;36(3):183—97 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23377696 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1007/s40264-013-0018-x
27. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the use of statistical signal detection methods in the eudravigilance data analysis system. 2008 [online]. URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2009/11/WC500011434.pdf (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018).
28. Hazell L, Shakir SA. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385—96 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16689555 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003
29. Ziganshina LE, Reshetnikova ID, Fassaxov RS, et al. Nezhelatel`ny`e lekarstvenny`e reakcii // Metod. rek. dlya vrachej. MinZdrav Respubliki Tatarstan. Kazan`: 2005 (In Russ). URL: https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiT6dHt2efYAhVBWywKHTy7AwEQFggoMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fkpfu.ru%2Fdocs%2FF541556538%2FMetod.rekom..PDL..doc&usg=AOvVaw1ibSwnrp3-sUQNVoXOX8ui (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018)
30. Hauben M, Aronson JK. Defning ‘signal’ and its subtypes in pharmacovigilance based on a systematic review of previous defnitions. Drug Saf. 2009;32(2):99—110 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/19236117 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200932020-00003
31. Loginovskaya OA, Romanov BK, Kolbin AS, et al. Methods of working with pharmacovigilance signals. Kachestvennaya klinicheskaya praktika. 2017;3:38—42. (In Russ).
32. Wang HW, Hochberg AM, Pearson RK, et al. An experimental investigation of masking in the US FDA adverse event reporting system database. Drug Saf. 2010;33(12):1117—33 [online]. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21077702 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.2165/11584390-000000000-00000
33. Salvo F, Leborgne F, Tiessard F, et al. A potential event-competition bias in safety signal detection: results from a spontaneous reporting research database in France. Drug Saf. 2013;36(7):565—72 [online]. URL: https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23673817 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1007/s40264-013-0063-5
34. Evans SJ, Waller PC, Davis S. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001;10(6):483—6 [online]. URL: https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11828828 (data obrashcheniya 20.01.2018). DOI: 10.1002/pds.677
35. Galankin TL, Kolbin AS. Role of randomized trials in pharmacoepidemiology. Pharmacoeconomy. Modern pharmacoeconomics and pharmacoepidemiology. 2014;7(1):4—8. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Popova N.S., Philippova A.V., Gakankin T.L., Kolbin A.S., Kasimova A.R. Hepatotoxicity of new oral anticoagulants: literature review. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2018;(3):66-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2588- 0519-2018-10052