<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">clinvest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Качественная клиническая практика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2588-0519</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2618-8473</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ООО «Издательство ОКИ</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">clinvest-189</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФАРМАКОЭКОНОМИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PHARMACOECONOMICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Оценка эффективности затрат на терапию второй линии неоперабельного немелкоклеточного рака лёгкого гефитинибом</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title></trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рудакова</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Проценко</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>Санкт-Петербургская химико-фармацевтическая академия, г. Санкт-Петербург</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-2"><institution>НИИ онкологии им. Н.Н. Петрова, г. Санкт-Петербург</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>06</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>31</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Рудакова А.В., Проценко С.А., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Рудакова А.В., Проценко С.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Рудакова А.В., Проценко С.А.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/189">https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/189</self-uri><abstract><p>Актуальность. Терапия немелкоклеточного рака лёгкого (НМРЛ) — сложная клиническая проблема. Выявление оптимального варианта терапии требует не только анализа данных по клинической эффективности, но и оценки эффективности затрат на применяемые лекарственные средства. Цель: оценка эффективности затрат на гефитиниб у пациентов с НМРЛ при неэффективности химиотерапии 1-ой линии. Методология. Моделирование на основе результатов клинических исследований. Учитывались только прямые медицинские затраты. Результаты. Анализ показал, что у пациентов с НМРЛ при неэффективности химиотерапии 1-ой линии гефитиниб по сравнению с оригинальным доцетакселом увеличивает продолжительность жизни с учетом качества на 0,013 QALY при одновременной экономии 8,27 тыс. руб. в расчёте на 1 пациента. Затраты в расчёте на 1 мес. без прогрессирования составляют при этом 84,39 и 81,08 тыс. руб. при терапии доцетакселом и гефитинибом, соответственно. Выводы. Назначение гефитиниба во 2-ой линии терапии пациентам с НМРЛ клинически и экономически оправданно по сравнению с оригинальным доцетакселом, пеметрекседом и эрлотинибом.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>немелкоклеточный рак лёгкого</kwd><kwd>гефитиниб</kwd><kwd>фармакоэкономика</kwd><kwd>анализ эффективности затрат</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Petrelli N., Winer E., Brahmer J., et al. Clinical Cancer Advances 2009: Major Research Advances in Cancer Treatment, Prevention, and Screening — A Report From the American Society of Clinical Oncology. // J. Clin. Oncol. 2009; 27: 6052 — 6069.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petrelli N., Winer E., Brahmer J., et al. Clinical Cancer Advances 2009: Major Research Advances in Cancer Treatment, Prevention, and Screening — A Report From the American Society of Clinical Oncology. // J. Clin. Oncol. 2009; 27: 6052 — 6069.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malin J. Wrestling with the high price of cancer care: should we control costs by Individuals’ ability to pay or society’s willingness to pay? // J. Clin. Oncol. 2010; 28: 3212 — 3214.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malin J. Wrestling with the high price of cancer care: should we control costs by Individuals’ ability to pay or society’s willingness to pay? // J. Clin. Oncol. 2010; 28: 3212 — 3214.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hlatky M., Owens D., Sanders G. Cost-eﬀ ectiveness as an outcome in randomized clinical trials. // Clin. Trials 2006; 3; 543. DOI: 10.1177/1740774506073105.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hlatky M., Owens D., Sanders G. Cost-eﬀ ectiveness as an outcome in randomized clinical trials. // Clin. Trials 2006; 3; 543. DOI: 10.1177/1740774506073105.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rawlins M., Culyer A. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. // BMJ 2004; 329: 224-227.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rawlins M., Culyer A. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. // BMJ 2004; 329: 224-227.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Resch В., Gusenleitnerl W., Nuijten M., et al. Cost-eﬀ ectiveness of palivizumab against respiratory syncytial viral infection in high-risk children in Austria. // Clinical Th erapeutics 2008; 30(4): 749-760.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Resch В., Gusenleitnerl W., Nuijten M., et al. Cost-eﬀ ectiveness of palivizumab against respiratory syncytial viral infection in high-risk children in Austria. // Clinical Th erapeutics 2008; 30(4): 749-760.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">World Health Organization. Investing in Health for Economic Development. Report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">World Health Organization. Investing in Health for Economic Development. Report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chabot I., Rocchi A. How do cost-eﬀ ectiveness analyses inform reimbursement decisions for oncology medicines in Canada? Th e example of sunitinib for ﬁ rst-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. // Value Health 2010; 13(6): 837-45.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chabot I., Rocchi A. How do cost-eﬀ ectiveness analyses inform reimbursement decisions for oncology medicines in Canada? Th e example of sunitinib for ﬁ rst-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. // Value Health 2010; 13(6): 837-45.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nadler E. S., Eckert B., Neumann P. Do oncologists believe new cancer drugs oﬀ er good value? // ASCO Meeting Abstracts 2005; 23: 6011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nadler E. S., Eckert B., Neumann P. Do oncologists believe new cancer drugs oﬀ er good value? // ASCO Meeting Abstracts 2005; 23: 6011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rocchi A., Menon D., Verma S., Miller E. Th e role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond // Value Health 2008; 11 (4): 771 — 783.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rocchi A., Menon D., Verma S., Miller E. Th e role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond // Value Health 2008; 11 (4): 771 — 783.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Проценко С.А., Рудакова А.В., Моисеенко Ф.В. и др. Фармакоэкономический анализ терапии гефитинибом больных немелкоклеточным раком легкого. // Вопр. онкологии 2012; 58 (3): 352-358.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Проценко С.А., Рудакова А.В., Моисеенко Ф.В. и др. Фармакоэкономический анализ терапии гефитинибом больных немелкоклеточным раком легкого. // Вопр. онкологии 2012; 58 (3): 352-358.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim E., Hirsh V., Mok T., et al. Geﬁ tinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial // Lancet 2008; 372: 1809—18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim E., Hirsh V., Mok T., et al. Geﬁ tinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial // Lancet 2008; 372: 1809—18.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jiang J., Huang L., Liang X., et al. Geﬁ tinib versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. // Acta Oncol. 2011; 50(4): 582-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jiang J., Huang L., Liang X., et al. Geﬁ tinib versus docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. // Acta Oncol. 2011; 50(4): 582-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sun J.-M., Lee H., Sang-we Kim, et al. Geﬁ tinib Versus Pemetrexed as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (KCSG-LU08-01). An Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial. // Cancer 2012; 6234-42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sun J.-M., Lee H., Sang-we Kim, et al. Geﬁ tinib Versus Pemetrexed as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (KCSG-LU08-01). An Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial. // Cancer 2012; 6234-42.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim S., Uhma J., Leea J., et al. Randomized phase II study of geﬁ tinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who failed previous chemotherapy. // Lung Cancer 2012; 75: 82— 88.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim S., Uhma J., Leea J., et al. Randomized phase II study of geﬁ tinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who failed previous chemotherapy. // Lung Cancer 2012; 75: 82— 88.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Приложения к Генеральному тарифному соглашению по тарифам на медицинскую помощь (медицинские услуги) и условиям оплаты медицинской помощи, оказываемой в рамках действующей Территориальной программы обязательного медицинского страхования граждан Российской Федерации в Санкт-Петербурге на 2013 г. (www.spboms.ru)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Приложения к Генеральному тарифному соглашению по тарифам на медицинскую помощь (медицинские услуги) и условиям оплаты медицинской помощи, оказываемой в рамках действующей Территориальной программы обязательного медицинского страхования граждан Российской Федерации в Санкт-Петербурге на 2013 г. (www.spboms.ru)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewis G., Peake M., Aultman R., et al. Cost-Eﬀ ectiveness of Erlotinib versus Docetaxel for Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United Kingdom. // Journal of International Medical Research 2010; 38: 9-21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewis G., Peake M., Aultman R., et al. Cost-Eﬀ ectiveness of Erlotinib versus Docetaxel for Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United Kingdom. // Journal of International Medical Research 2010; 38: 9-21.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">NICE. Appraising life extending, end of life treatments. 2009. www.nice.org.uk/media/88A/F2/SupplementaryAdviceTACEoL.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">NICE. Appraising life extending, end of life treatments. 2009. www.nice.org.uk/media/88A/F2/SupplementaryAdviceTACEoL.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
